Friday, October 31, 2008

S.O.B.

Shop our Businesses in IRB

In a recession, the economy operates backwards. It recedes instead of advancing. Most folks you talk to in IRB have all felt the pinch…albeit to differing degrees. But, the folks most affected by the economic downturn are our small businesses—our shops, restaurants, bars, salons, etc.

The official definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of negative economic growth marked by a slump in consumer spending. Only a very few number of businesses—like funeral homes--are truly recession-proof. (Death and taxes, right?) For the average retailer here on the barrier island, the challenge is to keep the doors open with less revenue while maintaining the same quality and level of service. Nearly 70% of the U.S. economy relies on consumer spending. For our local restaurants, hotels, shops, bars, etc. in IRB, that percentage is undoubtedly much higher.

It’s more important now than ever to “buy” locally. As a community, IRB is fortunate to have so many solid small businesses headed by smart, successful proprietors. They deserve our respect and our support—now and always.

In lean times, businesses tend to reduce advertising expenditures, so we must be proactive patrons—and visit without waiting to be “coaxed” to do so. Some IRB businesses have intelligently explored ways to replace the business robbed by the economy. My Place, J.D.’s and Crabby Bill’s appeared at last Tuesday's commission meeting (10/28) to ask the City to allow them to extend live entertainment hours by one hour on the weekends. Please urge your City Commission to grant this request. And hopefully, as former City Commission candidate and IRB P & Z Board Member Don House suggested, the deadline for businesses to comply with the new sign ordinance will also be extended. As a community, we need to do everything possible to keep the businesses we love from being downturn casualties…even if it means lesser emphasis on the esthetics...at least in the short run.

You’ll notice a new addition to the right-hand column of the IRBeHEARD blog—IRBeBiz. E-mail us at
irbeheard@cmdinc.net with a great experience you’ve had with an IRB business. We’ll share it with our readers in an upcoming posting—a little FREE word-of-blog advertising for our local businesses!

Shop, eat, party, pamper, recreate…right here at home in IRB. It saves on gas!

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

FIRED AND RE-FIRED

Schless Pink Slipped--AGAIN?

At the October 14th commission meeting, Finance Director Marty Schless was, by a 3-2 commission vote, relieved of his duties as our city’s Chief Financial Officer. However, the item, as it appeared on the meeting agenda, called for a performance review only. Once again, it took citizens to point out that Marty’s firing was not agenda-ed properly and that the action taken needed to be formalized by a resolution since termination of a charter officer requires it.

At last night’s commission meeting (October 28th), the City Attorney indicated that a resolution is in the works and asked that it be put on the next meeting’s agenda. So, another vote will be taken and Marty will be fired—a second time—by resolution. The termination, according to Kiefer will be retroactive. Doesn’t it seem like a lot of things require “doing and re-doing” these days?

Kennedy, who made the motion to fire Schless at the 10/14 meeting, went predictably into “blame mode” and asked if she did anything improper in making the motion to fire Marty. Kennedy carefully pointed out that she asked the City Attorney first before making the motion and Kiefer gave her the go-ahead.

Could this incessant need to point fingers be why no one on the commission seemed particularly “excited” about Kennedy’s desire to be appointed as the beaches’ representative on the Pinellas Planning Council?

In reference to Kennedy’s fingerpointing on the Schless firing, Kiefer said that everything was done properly but that a resolution was required. So, Marty’s “real” firing is now scheduled for the upcoming meeting on November 13th.

Blamers and bumblers and whiskers on kittens…some of IRB’s favorite things.

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB

Friday, October 24, 2008

IRB BLAME GAME

Fine Art of Fingerpointing

I often ask my two mischievous nephews the proverbial question…"Alright, which one of you two did this?" Inevitably, they grin and point to one another uttering those magical words nearly in unison “HE did.” I never get any closer to the answer, yet I still ask the question. The truth is that I get a kick out of their rather predictable responses. With kids, fingerpointing is amusing; with adults, it’s not…especially when it’s more motivated by politics than by a desire for “real” answers.

Last Sunday, October 29th, a St. Petersburg Times article included back-to-back fingerpointing quotes by two IRB City Commissioners.

When speaking of Finance Director’s Schless firing, Commission Wollin was quoted as saying: “It is not his fault that he was hired without that experience. That is the fault of the people that hired him.” Schless had no municipal accounting experience when joining the IRB staff. Do you think Wollin realizes she’s criticizing the judgment of the gentleman immediately to her right on dais, Mayor (then Commissioner) R.B. Johnson—who voted “Yea” on the Schless hiring? (Wasn't it Ockunzzi and Carmody who were the initial "NO" votes for Schless?)

Commissioner Kennedy's reported remark accuses the city of using “bad judgment” in hiring Marty without the proper experience. How soon she forgets that Marty's predecessor left behind an accounting mess so abomindable that it required a forensic accountant to unravel it. And that was a DiNicola commission who hired the Schless predecessor...right? That kind of spoils Kennedy's depiction of the “DiNicola Days” as some sort of beachy Camelot with herself as one the roundtable knights, doesn't it?

Commissioner Valery doesn’t point fingers. He speaks his mind and has very strong opinions but is not a blamer. The thoughtful Torres isn’t a fingerpointer either. Mayor R. B. Johnson almost goes the other way; he tends to accept responsibility for his decisions even when it’s not really warranted.

So…why is it that primarily the women on our commission engage in “blamecasting” every chance they get? Is the purpose of this selective disparagement to somehow make themselves look smarter or more qualified?

And, some of the fingerpointing has been rather expensive. Consultant Rob Garner’s timetable tracing the Sewer/Solid Waste Funds debacle represented thousands upon thousands of dollars in prime PowerPoint fingerpointing. His timetable listed the names of all the commissioners who sat on the commission and the dates when City Managers and Finance Directors came and went in relationship to the still-mysterious loans. Yet, when it came to showing important info, like the actual date when Pinellas County increased their rates to IRB, that info was noticeably missing. Instead, the date when the commission was TOLD about the County’s increase was shown…because that date better supported the claim that the County’s rate increase is what caused the Sewer Fund to go upside down.

Ironically, when it comes time to engaging in fingerpointing that could actually be beneficial, the commission suddenly develops a case of governmental carpal tunnel syndrome. Soon-to-be-departing Finance Director Marty Schless has been blamed for everything in IRB right down to Chief Chic-a-Si breaking his ankle while crossing the rocks in the Narrows. Don't some of the misdeeds Schless has been saddled with pre-date his arrival in IRB? Plenty of fingers were pointed at Marty alright. But, when it came to asking him the hard questions like “Who the hell authorized these loans?” or "Did you take it upon yourself to approve the loans," no commissioner so much as raised a pinky.

Is this commission protecting someone? Won’t the City’s errors and omissions insurance cover the loss if some sort of malfeasance can be shown? Isn’t that reason enough to put a proverbial finger on the culprit or culprits? Or, is it just easier to continue protecting those who put our City in such financial peril while the taxpayers foot the million dollar tab?

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB

Sunday, October 19, 2008

LEO RETORTS

Blasting Blog Comments

I received an e-mail on October 18th from our buddy, Leo Coughlin, who said the following:

“You have the following posted on your blog and this is to inform you that it erroneously is attributed as appearing on the news web site I edit, LeoReports (www.leoreports.com). Because it is falsely attributed and you may not know this from an anonymous poster, you would be well advised to remove immediately any connection of this with LeoReports. I understand that, in editing an influential news web site that thousands of people in the area depend on for news, there will be criticism directed my way and this is fine. But please don't post material falsely attributed to the LeoReports news web site.”

Technically, IRBeHEARD is NOT REQUIRED to do squat about what Coughlin claims to be an erroneous posting. According to Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

IRBeHEARD prides itself on the fact that posted comments are not censored in any way, shape or form. However, we certainly don’t want to hurt the reputation or credibility of such an influential news source, so we deleted it. Apologies to whoever posted it for doing so. If the commenter would care to repost it anonymously, hands off on this end.

Hmmm...Leo is considered the press? Does that mean that IRBTV would fit into the same category? IRBTV is a group of residents who are interested in bringing more transparency to our local government by streaming video of the commission meetings. With the exception of Commissioner Valery, opposition abounds.

P.S. Anyone have any ideas about the identity of the “Private Caller” who called my house on Sunday morning at 5:30 a.m. and hung up.

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB

Saturday, October 18, 2008

WHAT'S GOOD FOR IRB GOOSE

Isn’t Necessarily Good for IRB Gander

Selective Code Enforcement
A resident on Legion Lane (behind City Hall) was spotted by our selectively sharp-eyed code enforcer and cited for adding a railing to her steps. She was ordered to apply for a variance and pay triple permit fees. At the variance hearing, the City Attorney opined that a variance was not needed because it was only a minor improvement, yet the commission went ahead and voted anyway. Why didn’t the planning staff, building inspector, City Manager, etc. know the code? Did the commission vote on this unnecessary variance to avoid refunding this resident’s money? How is it that code enforcement spots a railing but fails to notice that the Mayor rarely cuts his grass? Most importantly, why didn’t any commissioner go to bat for this applicant? Isn't anyone sitting on the commission working for us?

Selective Law Enforcement
Economy is down. Unemployment and crime are up, yet IRB has less police protection. And, one of our officers sits at nearly every commisison meeting just in case someone gets out of line.

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB

Friday, October 17, 2008

SURPRISING PREZ CANDIDATE

It’s Someone You Know

For those who were hoping a third choice for President would emerge, your prayers have been answered. And, it’s someone from right here in IRB…would you believe? Click on the link below and check it out…

http://www.tsgnet.com/pres.php?id=46832&altf=Tdpuu&altl=Tibqjsp

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

TRUE COLORS


Whole Lot of "Leaving" Going On

Does anyone else, besides me, miss seeing the fall leaves? If so, here’s a taste of autumn in the New York Adirondacks. Autumn in all its splendor! [Photo submitted by IRB seasonal resident Lori Henry.]

Speaking of "leaving"...the City Commission voted on Tuesday night to relieve IRB Finance Director Marty Schless of his duties.

Mystery: Tuesday night's agenda item was listed as "Evaluation of City Treasurer." How did an evaluation discussion turn to termination? Did Commissioner Kennedy jump the gun and make an improper motion--a procedural error that, once again, went unnoticed?

Commissioner Kennedy voted NOT to fire Schless some months back and pointed to the lack of a plan as to her reasoning. So what's different now? There still isn't a plan...at least one the public has been made privvy to...yet she changed her vote?

Besides, isn't adoption of a resolution required to fire a charter officer? If so, why wasn't one drafted and passed? The word is that Schless will be staying on for 30 days, but how and when was that decided? It didn't happen at the meeting. And, since Marty reports to the commission, was this decision to keep him on for another month made off the dais and "outside" the sunshine? Was the commission polled by a third party in violation of the Sunshine Law?

What effect, if any, does firing Schless for writing the infamous Grieshaber check have on the City's lawsuit against the former City Manager? Won't Grieshaber now just say..."Hey, it was IRB's misstep, not mine; they even fired their own official over it"?

Nancy Obarski
Beach Trail/IRB